Skip to content

Journal article

Source notes

Obesity Reviews · 2010

Bibliographic details

Source record

J. C. M. Barte, N. C. W. Ter Bogt, R. P. Bogers, P. J. Teixeira, B. Blissmer, T. A. Mori, W. J. E. Bemelmans

Maintenance of weight loss after lifestyle interventions for overweight and obesity, a systematic review

Wiley. 11(12). 899-906.

DOI PMID: 20345430 Open original source
Study type
Systematic review
Review basis
Abstract only

Losing more weight at the start does not necessarily mean retaining a smaller proportion of that loss later. The authors examined 22 lifestyle interventions followed by at least a year without supervision. Across the selected studies, participants retained an average of 54% of their initial loss. Initial loss was not significantly related to the percentage maintained. Interventions producing more than 10% initial loss left an average net loss of 7.0% at follow-up, compared with 3.7% after initial losses of 5% to 10%. These are group-level findings from healthy participants with overweight described as Caucasian in the abstract.

The distinction between the proportion retained and the amount remaining is central. Keeping a similar proportion of a larger initial loss can still leave a larger net change. The authors found a consistent pattern when examining initial-loss categories within four larger intervention groups. However, this relationship does not prove that assigning a more ambitious target causes better maintenance, or that every method of reaching it is suitable.

How Does This Show Up in Real Life?

Two people can both regain some weight yet finish with different amounts of their initial change still maintained. Describing either experience only as regain misses that distinction. The paper suggests asking both how much weight was lost initially and how much remains off at follow-up, rather than interpreting any regain as a complete reversal. It also addresses a common concern that a larger initial change must be less sustainable simply because more can be regained. The reviewed evidence did not show a clear disadvantage in the proportion maintained. That observation can inform a discussion of goals, but it does not establish the safest target for a particular person or compare the benefits and risks of different ways to achieve it. Those questions require additional information.

Only the abstract was accessible, so intervention details and study-quality assessments were unavailable. The selected population limits generalization to other ethnic groups or people with additional health conditions. Follow-up lasted at least one year without supervision, but the abstract does not establish lifelong maintenance. Comparisons across interventions can also reflect differences beyond the amount initially lost.

Why We Cite It

Alpekin can use this source when explaining how the definition of success changes the reading of a weight-management result. It provides a basis for distinguishing a percentage of lost weight retained from a percentage of starting body weight, preventing two different measures from being presented as though they were interchangeable.

The findings support a more careful interpretation of maintenance, not a guarantee attached to a larger goal. Group averages describe what happened in the selected evidence; they cannot determine an individual's likely outcome or replace an assessment of the approach used to pursue it.

Where this source appears

Pages citing this source

0 pages · 0 articles · 0 wikis

No currently public pages cite this source.