Skip to content

Journal article

Source notes

Journal of Applied Physiology · 2017

Bibliographic details

Source record

Burke LM, van Loon LJC, Hawley JA

Postexercise muscle glycogen resynthesis in humans

122(5). 1055-1067.

DOI PMID: 27789774 Open original source
Study type
Human exercise recovery review
Review basis
Full text reviewed

Refueling after exercise is partly a question of how soon the muscles need to work hard again. Glycogen, carbohydrate stored in muscle, can fall substantially during demanding exercise. The paper examines how human muscles rebuild those stores. Following severe depletion, full restoration generally takes about 20–24 hours under suitable refueling conditions. Carbohydrate availability matters, but urgency depends on the recovery period. Starting promptly is more important when another demanding session follows soon than when there is a longer opportunity to eat. A fast initial storage rate and complete recovery are not the same outcome.

More complicated recovery nutrition is not always more effective. The paper reports that adding protein can help glycogen storage when carbohydrate intake is below the amount needed to maximize it, but does not reliably add a storage benefit when carbohydrate is already sufficient. That finding concerns glycogen specifically. It does not mean protein has no other role in recovery.

How Does This Show Up in Real Life?

Consider an athlete facing another hard session within 8 hours, compared with someone whose next demanding workout is the following day. The authors distinguish those situations because the first leaves less time to restore fuel. Their guidance emphasizes prompt carbohydrate intake when rapid recovery is needed. With a longer recovery period and enough carbohydrate and energy, meal timing and format can be more flexible. The paper reports that solid and liquid sources can both support restoration. This does not make a recovery drink mandatory, or make every workout a reason to maximize carbohydrate intake. It can inform the question “What does the next session require?” rather than imposing the same refueling ritual after every kind of activity.

Much of the evidence concerns glycogen-depleting exercise and conditions allowing ample carbohydrate intake. Real-world recovery can differ, particularly after muscle-damaging sport. The authors identify gaps for adolescent, older, and disabled athletes. Early advantages also do not always persist: one specialized carbohydrate comparison showed a storage advantage initially that disappeared later. A short recovery measurement should not be treated as durable superiority.

Why We Cite It

For Alpekin, this adds a useful constraint to nutrition planning: refueling should remain compatible with overall energy needs and nutrient quality, rather than becoming an isolated carbohydrate target. That can guide how recovery information is placed within a broader food plan, without implying that a particular Alpekin product is required.

Use this evidence to match the precision of recovery planning to the actual demand. Competitive schedules may justify close attention to timing, while other situations allow more flexibility. The paper supports context-sensitive decisions, not anxiety about missing a single universal postexercise moment.

Where this source appears

Pages citing this source

1 page · 0 articles · 1 wiki

Wikis