Skip to content

Journal article

Source notes

Journal of Applied Physiology · 2019

Bibliographic details

Source record

Bojsen-Møller J, Magnusson SP

Mechanical properties, physiological behavior, and function of aponeurosis and tendon

126(6). 1800-1807.

DOI PMID: 30946635 Open original source
Study type
Narrative physiological review
Review basis
Full text reviewed

How does a muscle's pull reach a bone when the connecting tissues do not all stretch alike? Tendons and aponeuroses, the broad sheets where muscle fibres attach, have different shapes and mechanical behaviour. Human imaging shows that even neighbouring regions can move differently. In one study discussed here, superficial layers of the Achilles tendon displaced about 20% less than deeper layers. This was a difference in movement during the measurement, not evidence that one layer was 20% weaker. The authors bring together human imaging, tissue experiments and animal research to explain how structure affects force transmission.

A tendon therefore cannot always be understood as a uniform rope. Its bundles may slide relative to one another, and its shape changes in three dimensions. An aponeurosis also behaves differently during active muscle contraction and passive stretching. These distinctions matter when interpreting stiffness or strain, meaning deformation relative to starting length. A measurement from one region does not necessarily describe the entire muscle–tendon unit.

How Does This Show Up in Real Life?

Consider the calf working during walking or running. Muscle fibres generate force while the Achilles tendon can store and return elastic energy. The broad attachment sheets within the muscle also deform, but they do not simply copy the free tendon's movement. This helps explain why observing ankle motion alone cannot reveal exactly what every tissue is doing. It also puts claims about a universally ideal tendon stiffness in perspective: tissues serving energy storage and precise force transfer face different demands. The paper discusses adaptation to loading, including increased stiffness after strength training, but provides no personal exercise or rehabilitation programme. Its practical value is understanding why tissue location, loading conditions and measurement method belong alongside any claim that a tendon has become stiffer, more elastic or better adapted.

The evidence spans different species, isolated tissue preparations and measurements in living people. Results from one tendon or animal cannot automatically be transferred to another. Several proposed roles for tendon twisting and force transfer between bundles remain uncertain. Imaging also captures only parts of a complex structure. The paper does not establish which regional movement patterns predict injury or determine an individual's recovery.

Use this account to judge explanations of tendon function more carefully. A single mechanical number needs context, and a plausible structural mechanism is not a proven treatment. The strongest contribution is a more realistic picture of how connected tissues share and transmit muscle force.

Where this source appears

Pages citing this source

1 page · 0 articles · 1 wiki

Wikis