Journal article
Source notes
International Journal of Sport Nutrition and Exercise Metabolism · 2019
Bibliographic details
Source record
International Association of Athletics Federations Consensus Statement 2019: Nutrition for Athletics
Human Kinetics. 29(2). 73-84.
- Study type
- Expert consensus statement
- Review basis
- Full text reviewed
Nutrition for athletics has to support both the event and the training that leads to it. A short race does not necessarily mean a small daily fuel demand, while a long race creates opportunities and challenges for eating during competition. The recommendations therefore vary across athletics disciplines and training phases. For example, the guidance proposes 30–60 grams of carbohydrate per hour during events lasting around 1–2.5 hours, with individual adjustment and practice. That is event-specific guidance for athletes, not a daily carbohydrate target or a recommendation for every exercise session.
The central principle is a nutrition plan fitted to the athlete's work, health, and practical circumstances. Getting enough energy is part of that plan: chronically inadequate intake can undermine health and performance in both female and male athletes. Food is the starting point, but the document recognizes specific roles for sports foods and selected supplements. Those roles depend on evidence, convenience, and risk; they do not validate the wider supplement market.
How Does This Show Up in Real Life?
A race-day plan should be familiar before competition begins. The authors recommend practicing food and fluid strategies during training so that access, timing, and digestive tolerance are considered together. A runner cannot assume that a theoretically suitable intake will be comfortable or achievable while racing. The same planning principle applies away from competition: harder training blocks, travel, injury recovery, and exposure to heat or altitude can change nutritional demands. A plan should be revisited as those demands change. For supplements, the document recommends weighing a specific purpose against the evidence and potential disadvantages, including contamination with prohibited substances. A convenient sports food can help when ordinary food is impractical, but convenience is different from a unique performance advantage. This approach encourages questions about the job a product is meant to do before treating it as a necessary part of training.
The recommendations bring together research and expert interpretation across many disciplines, rather than testing a single complete plan. Evidence is uneven across athlete groups, with fewer data for some female, younger, and older athletes. Results for one event or setting cannot automatically be applied to another. Long-term protein needs during weight loss and some combined supplement strategies remain areas with unresolved questions.
The document provides a framework for informed planning rather than a guarantee of improved results. Its usefulness lies in connecting nutrition decisions to a defined sporting demand. Recommendations work best when their original conditions and the individual athlete's response remain visible.
Where this source appears