Skip to content

Journal article

Source notes

Journal of Human Nutrition and Dietetics · 2025

Bibliographic details

Source record

D. Power, A. Jones, C. Keyworth, P. Dhir, A. Griffiths, K. Shepherd, J. Smith, G. Traviss‐Turner, J. Matu, L. Ells

Emotional Eating Interventions for Adults Living With Overweight and Obesity: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Behaviour Change Techniques

Wiley. 38(1). e13410.

Study type
Systematic review and meta-analysis
Review basis
Full text reviewed

Which parts of psychological support might help adults who eat in response to emotions? Across 47 studies involving 6,729 participants living with overweight or obesity, interventions were associated with improvements in emotional-eating scores and weight. The pooled before-and-after weight change from 32 studies was about four kilograms. That number is not an additional benefit over a control group. Techniques involving goals, feedback, values and self-regulation appeared in programs with promising results, but simply including more techniques was not associated with greater improvement.

The main analysis compared participants before and after treatment, including studies without a control group. Time, other program components and differences between participants can therefore influence the apparent benefits. Techniques usually occurred together, so their individual effects were not isolated. The findings identify candidates for better testing rather than proving that one psychological exercise is the active ingredient responsible for weight or eating changes.

How Does This Show Up in Real Life?

A program may promise to address emotional eating while offering only general diet instructions. The authors argue for assessing emotional eating and tailoring support to the person's needs. Their analysis suggests that the actual components of support deserve attention: how goals are reviewed, feedback is provided and personal values are considered. It does not provide a self-treatment recipe or show that adding every promising technique will improve results. Emotional-eating scores and weight are also distinct outcomes, and a technique associated with one was not necessarily associated with the other. The useful question when interpreting a program's evidence is which outcome improved, how it was measured and whether the comparison can separate the support from everything else happening during treatment.

Certainty was rated low because results varied greatly and some studies had important biases. More than 80% of participants were women, and ethnic representation was limited or poorly reported. Emotional eating was measured with questionnaires. Insufficient data prevented the planned analysis of effects at 12 months and of other health measures, leaving lasting and broader benefits uncertain.

Why We Cite It

Alpekin can use this source to evaluate whether a named therapy is described precisely enough to be understood or reproduced. It supports looking beyond the therapy label to the components delivered and the comparison tested, helping readers judge what a claim of psychological support actually refers to.

The evidence offers a direction for developing more appropriate support, with considerable uncertainty about specific ingredients. Take the promising changes seriously without treating them as guaranteed results. Better controlled comparisons and longer follow-up are needed before the most effective combination can be identified confidently.

Where this source appears

Pages citing this source

1 page · 1 article · 0 wikis

Articles