Skip to content

Journal article

Source notes

British Journal of Nutrition · 1999

Bibliographic details

Source record

Richard F. Hurrell, Manju Reddy, James D. Cook

Inhibition of non-haem iron absorption in man by polyphenolic-containing beverages

Cambridge University Press (CUP). 81(4). 289-295.

Study type
Controlled human meal-absorption experiments
Review basis
Full text reviewed

How much iron a meal provides depends partly on what is in the cup beside it. Researchers conducted eight experiments involving 77 healthy adults aged 19–40, measuring absorption of labeled non-heme iron, the form found in plant foods and many fortified foods. Participants consumed controlled meals or drinks for comparison. In one nine-person bread-meal experiment, average absorption of the test iron was 0.74% with black tea and 12.9% with water. Several herbal infusions and cocoa also reduced absorption. The differences concerned iron absorbed from those test meals, not a percentage loss of the body's existing iron.

The controlled comparisons support a direct effect of the tested beverages on meal-iron absorption. Polyphenols, a varied group of plant compounds, can bind iron during digestion. However, the drinks differed in both the amount and type of these compounds. Most importantly, a large reduction after one simple meal does not establish that habitual consumption causes anemia or the same reduction across a varied diet.

How Does This Show Up in Real Life?

When discussing low iron intake or deficiency risk, the drink served with a meal belongs in the conversation alongside the food. The authors specifically suggest considering these inhibitory effects when advising people most susceptible to iron deficiency. They do not establish that everyone should give up tea. Switching from black tea to a herbal infusion is not automatically a solution: peppermint also strongly reduced absorption under the test conditions. Adding milk to tea or coffee did not meaningfully remove the effect in the experiment that tested it. The paper does not establish an exact waiting time between a drink and a meal. Its practical contribution is identifying a meal interaction worth considering, not prescribing a universal beverage schedule.

Each experiment included only 8–10 people, and the participants were healthy adults rather than patients being treated for anemia. Most meals were simple bread meals, with fewer interacting ingredients than an ordinary diet. Blood measurements tracked absorbed labeled iron over the study period; they did not establish long-term effects on iron status, anemia, or persistence after changing drinking habits.

Why We Cite It

For Alpekin, this highlights a need to specify preparation when writing about drinks. The experiments varied tea strength under defined preparation conditions. Educational material accompanying a food pack could avoid treating every cup as the same exposure; product descriptions would need to distinguish the preparations actually tested from general drink categories.

Take the experimental effect seriously without turning it into a verdict on an entire drinking habit. A useful interpretation keeps the meal, beverage, and person's circumstances together. The unanswered question is how much the measured interaction matters across that person's usual diet.

Where this source appears

Pages citing this source

1 page · 1 article · 0 wikis

Articles