When you exercise in a group, “together” might mean sharing the session or trying to perform the same moves at the same time. Does matching add to the feeling of connection when everyone already has company?
The distinction is easy to see in dance: sharing music and a set of moves does not necessarily mean performing each move together. In a small experiment involving adult volunteers, most of them women, strangers danced in groups of four for 13 minutes. They faced one another and heard both the music and movement instructions through individual headphones. Each group was randomly assigned to a dance arrangement. One asked everyone to perform the same moves at the same time. Another used the same music and moves but delivered a different sequence of instructions to each dancer, so no two were instructed to make the same move simultaneously.1
Those asked to perform the moves together reported greater closeness afterward than those following different sequences. Both arrangements already included company, so this was a comparison of how people moved together within a group. The questionnaire included questions about how connected they felt to the other dancers, how much they liked them and how similar they thought their personalities were. Each answer was recorded on a seven-point scale, and the answers were averaged to give a single social-closeness score for each participant.1
Participants answered only after dancing, so the result compares how groups felt at that point, without measuring how much anyone’s own connection increased. Lasting relationships were not assessed.1
The experiment included another form of nonmatching movement: dancers were given different sets of moves and music tracks in different orders. Against this third arrangement, matching movements did not establish a clear difference in closeness. The third arrangement changed both what each dancer was doing and what they were hearing, whereas the main comparison kept the music and set of moves the same. The result also leaves open whether timing alone accounts for the difference in reported closeness. Those two arrangements changed matching and movement sequence together, and the dancers’ attention may also have differed.1
“Group exercise” can mean enjoying other people's company, trying to keep up with the same moves together, or some of both. You may recognize the difference when you think back to a class. Describing how you took part says more about the experience than simply counting who was there.
Join the discussion
No account or email is required. Your display name and comment will be public.