Skip to content

Journal article

When Your Muscles Make More Protein, Are They Getting Bigger?

A closer look at measurement timing, training stage, and the link between protein synthesis and later muscle size.

  • By Editorial Team
  • Published
  • 2 minutes read
Responsible editor
A cross-section of muscle beside a dumbbell and molecular shapes.

You read that a workout produced a larger increase in muscle protein synthesis. Before taking that as a reason to choose it, you want to know whether the measurement can tell you anything about muscle size weeks later. What would make that number a useful forecast?

Protein synthesis means making proteins. Myofibrillar protein synthesis concerns proteins in the muscle's force-producing structures. Tracking labeled building blocks into those proteins estimates production during a measurement window. It does not measure how much additional muscle remains weeks later. Net accumulation also depends on protein breakdown. More production and more lasting addition are therefore different claims.1

In 23 young men who had not resistance-trained in the previous year, synthesis measured one to six hours after their first workout and a protein-containing drink showed no significant correlation with thigh-muscle volume gains after 16 weeks. The study did not establish that a larger first response identified the men who would grow more. That result concerns an initial exposure and a short measurement window, not every possible use of protein-synthesis measurements.1

A separate ten-week experiment followed ten young men returning after at least six months without lower-body resistance training. Estimates covering 48 hours after exercise were highest after the initial workout, when microscopic signs of muscle damage were also greatest. Responses measured in weeks three and ten were smaller, yet both were associated with the increase in thigh-muscle cross-sectional area over the program. A smaller response later in training was not evidence that the program had stopped working.2

One interpretation is that the large initial response partly served repair and remodeling, rather than simply adding tissue. The observations support that possibility without tracing each newly made protein to a repair or growth task. They also do not prove that reducing damage caused synthesis to become more growth-directed. Later correlations in this small cohort were not a validated prediction tool for an individual, and week three was not established as a universal biological switch.2

When a claim celebrates a bigger synthesis response, ask what was measured, over which hours or days, and at what stage of training. Those details make the promise clearer than the word “more” can on its own.

References

  1. Mitchell CJ et al.. Acute post-exercise myofibrillar protein synthesis is not correlated with resistance training-induced muscle hypertrophy in young men. PLOS ONE, 2014.
  2. Damas F et al.. Resistance training-induced changes in integrated myofibrillar protein synthesis are related to hypertrophy only after attenuation of muscle damage. The Journal of Physiology, 2016.

Continue reading

Conversation

Discussion

0 comments

No comments yet. Start the conversation.

Join the discussion

No account or email is required. Your display name and comment will be public.